The involuntary termination of a YouTube user’s access, resulting in the removal of their channel and associated content, constitutes a significant event. This action, initiated by YouTube’s platform administrators, stems from perceived violations of established community guidelines or terms of service. For instance, a channel repeatedly posting copyrighted material, engaging in hate speech, or promoting harmful or dangerous activities may face such consequences.
The ramifications of such a termination extend beyond the immediate loss of the channel. Content creators often experience financial setbacks due to lost advertising revenue, the inability to monetize future content, and damage to their professional reputation. Furthermore, the erasure of a channel may represent a substantial loss of creative output and community engagement, particularly for creators who have cultivated a significant audience over time. The permanence of the decision can be a point of considerable frustration, especially if perceived as unjust or based on inaccurate information.
Understanding the specific reasons behind account terminations, the avenues for appeal and recourse, and preventative measures to avoid such outcomes are vital for individuals and organizations leveraging the YouTube platform for content creation and audience engagement. The following sections will delve into these crucial areas, providing a framework for navigating the complexities of YouTube’s content moderation policies and account management practices.
1. Violation of Terms
A direct causal relationship exists between breaches of YouTube’s Terms of Service and the platform’s removal of user accounts. The Terms of Service functions as the governing contract between YouTube and its users, delineating acceptable conduct and content standards. Any action deemed by YouTube to contravene these stipulated terms can, and often does, result in account termination. Infringements range from copyright violations, the dissemination of hate speech, promotion of illegal activities, to the creation of spam or deceptive content. These breaches undermine the integrity of the platform and negatively impact its user base.
One critical aspect is the interpretation and application of these terms. YouTube’s moderation systems, both automated and human-reviewed, assess content against these defined standards. However, ambiguities in the terms, coupled with the scale of content being processed, can lead to inconsistencies in enforcement. For example, a channel using copyrighted music without proper licensing may receive copyright strikes, ultimately leading to account deletion. Similarly, channels promoting harmful misinformation, particularly related to health or safety, are subject to removal based on the violation of specific content guidelines. Understanding the specifics of these Terms and the potential consequences of violating them is paramount for maintaining a YouTube presence.
In essence, adherence to the Terms of Service is a prerequisite for continued access to and use of the YouTube platform. Violation of these terms represents a significant risk factor for account deletion. Content creators must proactively familiarize themselves with the latest version of the Terms and ensure their content and activities align with the outlined policies to mitigate the potential for account termination and the associated loss of content, audience, and revenue.
2. Copyright Infringement Claims
Copyright infringement claims stand as a primary catalyst for account terminations on the YouTube platform. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and similar international laws mandate that platforms like YouTube provide mechanisms for copyright holders to report unauthorized use of their protected works. The validity and handling of these claims directly influence the status of user accounts.
-
Content ID System
YouTube’s Content ID system automatically scans uploaded videos against a database of copyrighted material submitted by rights holders. When a match is detected, the copyright holder can choose to monetize the video, track its viewership, or issue a takedown request. A successful takedown request, predicated on a legitimate copyright claim, initiates a strike against the infringing channel. Multiple strikes can lead to account deletion.
-
DMCA Takedown Notices
Copyright owners can directly submit DMCA takedown notices to YouTube, alleging copyright infringement. YouTube is legally obligated to process these notices promptly. If YouTube deems the notice valid, it will remove the allegedly infringing content and issue a copyright strike to the user’s account. Failure to comply with a valid DMCA takedown notice could expose YouTube to legal liability.
-
Repeat Infringer Policy
YouTube operates under a “repeat infringer” policy, which stipulates that accounts accruing three copyright strikes within a defined timeframe (typically 90 days) are subject to termination. This policy aims to deter widespread copyright infringement and protect the rights of copyright holders. The consequences of accumulating multiple strikes are severe and often irreversible.
-
Counter-Notifications and Disputes
Users who believe a copyright claim is unfounded have the option to file a counter-notification, asserting their legal right to use the material in question (e.g., fair use, parody). If the copyright holder does not initiate a lawsuit within a specified period, YouTube may reinstate the content. The process of filing a counter-notification requires a thorough understanding of copyright law and carries legal implications.
The interplay between Content ID, DMCA takedown notices, and YouTube’s repeat infringer policy creates a complex environment for content creators. Accusations of copyright infringement, whether valid or not, can precipitate account deletion, highlighting the need for creators to diligently respect copyright laws, understand their rights, and carefully navigate the mechanisms available for disputing claims. The proactive management of copyright issues is paramount to preserving a YouTube channel and avoiding irreversible account termination.
3. Community Guidelines Breaches
Violations of YouTube’s Community Guidelines represent a significant precipitating factor in account terminations. These guidelines delineate acceptable behavior and content within the platform’s ecosystem, and their enforcement directly impacts the availability of user accounts. Non-compliance, whether intentional or unintentional, can lead to content removal, channel strikes, and, ultimately, account deletion.
-
Hate Speech and Discrimination
The dissemination of content promoting hatred, discrimination, or disparagement based on attributes such as race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, disability, or other protected characteristics constitutes a severe breach. YouTube maintains a zero-tolerance policy towards hate speech, and violations can result in immediate account termination. For example, channels consistently posting derogatory content targeting specific ethnic groups are subject to removal. This stringent stance reflects YouTube’s commitment to fostering an inclusive and respectful online environment.
-
Harassment and Bullying
Engaging in targeted harassment, bullying, or threats against individuals or groups is strictly prohibited. This includes content designed to shame, intimidate, or humiliate others. Examples include channels dedicated to doxxing individuals (revealing their personal information), inciting online mobs, or making credible threats of violence. The consequences of such actions can extend beyond account deletion, potentially involving legal repercussions.
-
Spam and Deceptive Practices
Employing spam techniques to artificially inflate views, subscribers, or engagement metrics, or engaging in deceptive practices such as impersonation or spreading misinformation, undermines the integrity of the platform. Channels utilizing bot networks, creating fake accounts, or promoting scams are subject to removal. YouTube actively combats such activities to ensure a fair and authentic experience for its users.
-
Violent and Graphic Content
The promotion of violence, graphic depictions of injury or death, or the glorification of harmful activities are prohibited. Channels posting videos of extreme violence, promoting illegal or dangerous acts, or inciting violence are subject to immediate termination. YouTube prioritizes the safety and well-being of its users and takes a firm stance against content that could incite real-world harm.
These breaches, while distinct, collectively contribute to the overarching problem of account terminations. Each violation weakens the community and degrades the platform experience. While copyright infringement is a common cause, these examples of Community Guidelines breaches highlight that content standards are as, if not more, important for the platform. By stringently enforcing these guidelines, YouTube aims to maintain a safe, respectful, and authentic online environment. However, the subjectivity inherent in interpreting these guidelines can sometimes lead to controversies, underscoring the need for transparency and accountability in the moderation process.
4. Automated System Errors
The involuntary termination of YouTube accounts can, in some instances, stem from errors within YouTube’s automated systems. These systems, designed to detect and flag content that violates community guidelines or copyright policies, operate on complex algorithms. While intended to enhance efficiency and scalability in content moderation, inherent limitations within these algorithms can lead to misidentification and erroneous account terminations. A false positive, where content is incorrectly flagged as violating a policy, can trigger automated account suspension or deletion protocols. The scale of YouTube’s operations exacerbates this issue, as even a small error rate can impact a significant number of users.
Examples of such errors may include automated copyright strikes issued based on inaccurate audio or video matching, or the misclassification of legitimate content as hate speech due to algorithmic biases. In one documented instance, a creator using public domain music received multiple copyright strikes due to an error in the Content ID system. Similarly, channels using certain keywords or phrases, even in benign contexts, have been known to be mistakenly flagged for policy violations. Such incidents underscore the critical need for robust error detection and correction mechanisms within YouTube’s automated content moderation systems. The absence of adequate oversight and appeal processes can result in significant disruption and financial losses for affected creators.
The potential for automated system errors to result in unwarranted account deletions necessitates a focus on improving algorithmic accuracy, transparency, and user recourse options. Strengthening error detection protocols, providing clear explanations for automated decisions, and offering accessible appeal mechanisms are crucial steps in mitigating the adverse effects of these errors. Understanding the role of automated system errors in account terminations is essential for both YouTube and its user base to foster a fairer and more reliable content ecosystem. The ongoing challenge lies in balancing the efficiency of automated moderation with the need to protect creators from the unintended consequences of algorithmic fallibility.
5. Appealing the Decision
The ability to formally contest a YouTube account termination represents a crucial recourse for users affected by the platform’s content moderation policies. The appeal process provides an opportunity to present evidence, clarify misunderstandings, and challenge the rationale behind the account deletion. Its availability and effectiveness are paramount in ensuring fairness and accountability within YouTube’s enforcement mechanisms.
-
Grounds for Appeal
Appeals can be initiated based on various grounds, including claims of mistaken identity, misinterpretation of content, or erroneous application of community guidelines. Users might argue that the flagged content did not violate YouTube’s policies, or that extenuating circumstances justify its presence on the platform. For instance, a channel terminated for copyright infringement might assert fair use, educational purposes, or licensed content. The strength of the appeal hinges on the clarity and persuasiveness of the supporting evidence.
-
The Appeal Process
Typically, the appeal process involves submitting a formal request through YouTube’s designated channels, often via a form or email. The appeal should clearly articulate the reasons for contesting the decision and provide supporting documentation, such as licenses, permissions, or contextual explanations. YouTube’s review team then assesses the appeal, considering the submitted evidence and the original justification for the account termination. The timeline for a decision can vary, ranging from a few days to several weeks, depending on the complexity of the case and the volume of appeals being processed.
-
Potential Outcomes
The appeal process can result in one of several outcomes. The account termination may be reversed, restoring the channel to its previous state. Alternatively, the appeal may be denied, upholding the original decision. In some cases, YouTube might offer a partial restoration, such as reinstating specific videos while maintaining the account suspension. The outcome depends on the persuasiveness of the appeal and YouTube’s interpretation of its own policies. Denial of an appeal represents a final decision from YouTube’s perspective, although external avenues for recourse, such as legal action, may exist.
-
Factors Influencing Success
Several factors can influence the likelihood of a successful appeal. A well-articulated and evidence-based appeal significantly enhances the chances of a favorable outcome. Demonstrating a clear understanding of YouTube’s policies and providing compelling arguments for their misapplication is critical. Conversely, vague or unsubstantiated appeals are less likely to succeed. A history of compliance with YouTube’s policies can also strengthen an appeal, while previous violations may weaken it. The specific nature of the violation and the quality of the submitted evidence are paramount in determining the outcome.
Appealing a YouTube account termination is a critical step for users who believe their account was unjustly removed. While the appeal process does not guarantee reinstatement, it provides a necessary mechanism for challenging potentially erroneous decisions and upholding principles of fairness and accountability within the platform. The effective utilization of this process, coupled with a thorough understanding of YouTube’s policies, is essential for navigating the complexities of content moderation and protecting user rights.
6. Restoring Channel Access
The endeavor of restoring channel access is intrinsically linked to the event of a YouTube account deletion. Once an account is terminated, the primary objective becomes regaining control and functionality of the affected channel. The success of this endeavor hinges on a variety of factors, encompassing both user actions and YouTube’s internal processes.
-
Appeal Adjudication
The single most influential factor in restoring channel access is the outcome of the formal appeal process initiated after an account termination. If the appeal is successful, YouTube reverses its decision, and channel access is reinstated. The appeal’s success hinges on presenting compelling evidence of policy compliance or demonstrating errors in the initial termination. A successful appeal directly translates to the restoration of channel access, negating the initial account deletion.
-
Policy Compliance Remediation
In certain instances, even if the initial appeal is unsuccessful, restoring channel access may be possible if the user demonstrably rectifies the policy violations that led to the account deletion. This might involve removing offending content, undergoing policy training, or implementing preventative measures to avoid future violations. YouTube may, at its discretion, consider reinstatement if the user demonstrates a genuine commitment to adhering to platform guidelines. This path to restoration requires a proactive approach and a clear understanding of the specific reasons for the initial termination.
-
Legal Recourse
Although rare, legal action represents a potential, albeit complex, avenue for restoring channel access. If a user believes their account was unjustly terminated and that YouTube acted in bad faith or violated contractual agreements, they may pursue legal remedies. Success in such cases is heavily dependent on the specific legal jurisdiction and the strength of the evidence presented. However, it represents a costly and time-consuming approach, typically reserved for situations where significant financial losses or reputational damage have occurred.
-
Alternative Channel Creation
In the event that all other options fail, creating a new YouTube channel becomes the only remaining possibility. However, it is crucial to understand that circumventing previous terminations by creating new accounts to replicate the prohibited content will only result in further account deletions. To be successful, the new channel must fully comply with YouTube’s policies and operate independently of the reasons that led to the original termination.
The potential for restoring channel access following a YouTube account deletion varies significantly, depending on the circumstances surrounding the termination, the user’s response, and YouTube’s internal review processes. While a successful appeal is the most direct path to reinstatement, other avenues, such as policy compliance remediation or, in extreme cases, legal action, may also be explored. Understanding these options and pursuing them strategically is essential for users seeking to regain their presence on the YouTube platform after an account deletion.
7. Content Moderation Policies
Content moderation policies serve as the foundational framework governing acceptable content and user behavior on YouTube. The enforcement of these policies directly impacts the prevalence of account terminations, as violations are a primary driver for account deletion. Understanding the intricacies of these policies is crucial for content creators to avoid unintentional breaches and maintain a compliant presence on the platform.
-
Automated Detection Systems
YouTube employs automated systems to scan uploaded content for potential violations of its moderation policies. These systems, while efficient in processing large volumes of data, can sometimes generate false positives, leading to incorrect flagging and potential account suspension. An example would be the misidentification of music as copyrighted material, resulting in a copyright strike. The implication is that content creators are reliant on the accuracy of these systems, while also being vulnerable to their errors.
-
Human Review Processes
Content flagged by automated systems, or reported by users, undergoes review by human moderators. These moderators assess the content against YouTube’s community guidelines and terms of service. This process introduces a layer of subjective interpretation, where nuances of context and intent can influence the outcome. A video deemed humorous satire by one moderator might be viewed as hate speech by another. This subjectivity highlights the challenges inherent in uniformly applying content moderation policies across a diverse range of content.
-
Transparency and Communication
Effective content moderation requires transparency and clear communication between YouTube and its users. Users need to understand the specific reasons behind content removals or account suspensions to correct their behavior or file appeals. Vague or incomplete explanations can breed mistrust and frustration. For example, a content creator whose video is removed for “violating community guidelines” without further clarification may struggle to understand the specific infraction. The implication is that clear and specific communication is vital for fostering a constructive relationship between the platform and its users.
-
Policy Evolution and Adaptability
Content moderation policies are not static; they evolve over time to address emerging challenges and adapt to changing societal norms. What might have been acceptable content a few years ago may now be prohibited. For instance, YouTube’s policies on misinformation have been significantly strengthened in response to the spread of harmful conspiracy theories. This evolution necessitates that content creators stay informed about the latest updates to the platform’s policies to avoid inadvertent violations. The ability to adapt to these evolving standards is critical for maintaining a compliant presence on YouTube.
In summary, content moderation policies are the backbone of YouTube’s efforts to maintain a safe and compliant platform. The automated detection systems, human review processes, transparency in communication, and policy evolution all contribute to the overarching system that determines which accounts are terminated and which are allowed to thrive. A thorough understanding of these facets is paramount for any content creator seeking to avoid the experience of account deletion.
8. Account Security Measures
The robustness of account security measures directly influences the vulnerability of a YouTube channel to unauthorized access and subsequent compromise, potentially leading to its deletion. Neglecting fundamental security protocols elevates the risk of malicious activity, including policy violations enacted by unauthorized users, which can trigger account termination by YouTube’s automated systems or manual review teams.
-
Strong Password Implementation
The establishment of a complex, unique password serves as the initial barrier against unauthorized access. Easily guessable passwords or the reuse of passwords across multiple platforms significantly increase the likelihood of account compromise. For example, a compromised email account, using the same password as a YouTube account, provides an attacker with direct access to the YouTube channel. The implications of weak password hygiene extend to the potential for illicit content uploads or policy violations enacted by the unauthorized user, ultimately resulting in account deletion.
-
Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) Activation
Two-factor authentication adds an additional layer of security by requiring a second verification method, typically a code generated on a mobile device, in addition to the password. This significantly hinders unauthorized access, even if the password is compromised. Consider a scenario where an attacker obtains a YouTube account password; without access to the user’s mobile device or backup codes, they cannot bypass the 2FA requirement. The activation of 2FA drastically reduces the risk of unauthorized account usage and subsequent policy violations leading to deletion.
-
Phishing Awareness and Prevention
Phishing attacks, designed to trick users into divulging their login credentials or other sensitive information, represent a significant threat to YouTube account security. Attackers often employ deceptive emails or websites that mimic legitimate YouTube communications to harvest user credentials. For instance, a user might receive an email purportedly from YouTube, requesting account verification and prompting them to enter their login details on a fraudulent website. Succumbing to such a phishing attempt grants attackers access to the account, enabling them to engage in activities that could trigger account deletion, such as uploading prohibited content or violating community guidelines.
-
Regular Security Audits and Monitoring
Periodic review of account activity logs and security settings allows users to identify and address potential security breaches proactively. Monitoring login locations, authorized devices, and linked applications can reveal unauthorized access attempts or suspicious activity. For example, a user might notice login attempts from unfamiliar locations or unauthorized applications linked to their account. Early detection of such anomalies allows for prompt action, such as changing passwords and revoking access permissions, thereby mitigating the risk of account compromise and subsequent deletion.
In conclusion, the implementation and diligent maintenance of robust account security measures are paramount in safeguarding a YouTube channel from unauthorized access and subsequent policy violations. The failure to prioritize these security protocols significantly elevates the risk of account compromise and eventual deletion, underscoring the critical importance of proactive security practices for all YouTube content creators.
9. Preventative Strategies
Effective implementation of preventative strategies serves as a crucial defense against the potential for account termination on YouTube. Proactive measures, focused on adhering to platform policies and maintaining robust account security, significantly mitigate the risk factors that can lead to account deletion.
-
Thorough Understanding of YouTube Policies
A comprehensive grasp of YouTube’s Community Guidelines, Terms of Service, and Copyright Policies is paramount. This knowledge enables content creators to produce material that aligns with platform standards, minimizing the likelihood of policy violations. For example, carefully reviewing and adhering to the guidelines regarding hate speech, harassment, and violent content significantly reduces the risk of content flagging and subsequent account action. A proactive approach to understanding and applying these policies is essential for sustained compliance.
-
Diligent Copyright Compliance Practices
Implementing rigorous copyright compliance procedures is vital to avoid infringement claims. This includes securing necessary licenses for copyrighted material used in videos, understanding fair use principles, and utilizing YouTube’s Content ID system to monitor potential copyright matches. An example would be obtaining explicit permission to use music tracks or video clips from copyright holders. Neglecting these practices can result in copyright strikes and eventual account termination. Therefore, proactive copyright management is a critical preventative strategy.
-
Proactive Account Security Measures
Implementing robust account security protocols safeguards against unauthorized access and potential compromise. This includes using strong, unique passwords, enabling two-factor authentication, and remaining vigilant against phishing attempts. For instance, setting up two-factor authentication adds an extra layer of security, preventing unauthorized access even if the password is compromised. Compromised accounts can be used to violate YouTube’s policies, leading to account deletion. Prioritizing account security is a fundamental preventative measure.
-
Regular Content Review and Monitoring
Periodically reviewing existing content and monitoring channel performance allows for the early detection and correction of potential policy violations. This includes identifying and removing content that may no longer comply with updated guidelines or addressing viewer complaints promptly. An example would be reviewing older videos for potentially offensive language or outdated information. This proactive approach allows content creators to address potential issues before they escalate to account-level actions, serving as a crucial preventative strategy.
These preventative strategies, when diligently implemented, significantly reduce the likelihood of account termination on YouTube. By proactively adhering to platform policies, managing copyright concerns, securing accounts against unauthorized access, and consistently monitoring content, creators can minimize their risk and sustain a compliant, long-term presence on the platform. These efforts collectively contribute to a more secure and sustainable YouTube presence, mitigating the potential for account deletion and its associated consequences.
Frequently Asked Questions Regarding YouTube Account Deletion
The following section addresses common inquiries surrounding the involuntary removal of YouTube accounts, providing concise and informative responses.
Question 1: What are the primary reasons YouTube terminates accounts?
Account terminations typically stem from violations of YouTube’s Community Guidelines, Terms of Service, or Copyright Policies. Specific infractions may include hate speech, harassment, copyright infringement, spam, or the promotion of illegal activities.
Question 2: How does YouTube detect policy violations?
YouTube utilizes a combination of automated systems and human reviewers to identify content that potentially violates its policies. Automated systems scan for specific patterns and keywords, while human reviewers assess content flagged by the systems or reported by users.
Question 3: What is the “three strikes” policy regarding copyright infringement?
YouTube operates under a “three strikes” policy, wherein an account receiving three copyright strikes within a 90-day period is subject to termination. Copyright strikes are issued when a copyright holder alleges unauthorized use of their protected material.
Question 4: Is it possible to appeal a YouTube account termination?
Yes, YouTube provides an appeal process for users who believe their account was unjustly terminated. The appeal must be submitted through YouTube’s designated channels and should include supporting evidence to challenge the decision.
Question 5: What steps can be taken to prevent account termination?
Preventative measures include a thorough understanding of YouTube’s policies, diligent copyright compliance practices, the implementation of robust account security measures, and regular content review to identify and address potential violations.
Question 6: What recourse is available if an appeal is denied?
If an appeal is denied, options are limited. The terminated account remains inaccessible. In rare instances where a breach of contract or malicious intent can be proven, legal action may be considered. Creating a new account that strictly adheres to all guidelines is also an option.
Understanding the reasons for account terminations, the appeal process, and preventative strategies are essential for maintaining a compliant presence on YouTube. Proactive measures significantly reduce the risk of account deletion and its associated consequences.
The next section provides a concluding summary of the key aspects discussed in this article.
Mitigating the Risk of YouTube Account Deletion
The following guidelines outline critical actions to minimize the probability of involuntary YouTube account termination. Adherence to these recommendations promotes compliance and safeguards channel integrity.
Tip 1: Prioritize Policy Familiarization: Engage in a comprehensive and ongoing review of YouTube’s Community Guidelines, Terms of Service, and Copyright Policies. These documents undergo periodic revisions. Regular updates ensure compliance with current platform standards.
Tip 2: Implement Rigorous Copyright Practices: Procure explicit licenses or permissions for all copyrighted material incorporated into video content. Understand fair use principles and their application. Utilize YouTube’s Content ID system to proactively identify and address potential copyright conflicts.
Tip 3: Fortify Account Security Infrastructure: Establish a complex, unique password and enable two-factor authentication (2FA) for all associated accounts. Remain vigilant against phishing attempts and regularly review account activity logs for unauthorized access or suspicious behavior.
Tip 4: Conduct Regular Content Audits: Schedule routine reviews of existing video content to identify potential policy violations. Address outdated information, offensive language, or evolving guideline interpretations. Promptly remove or revise content that may pose a compliance risk.
Tip 5: Maintain Transparent Communication: Clearly disclose any sponsored content or affiliate links within video descriptions. Avoid deceptive practices, such as inflating views or subscribers through artificial means. Transparency fosters trust with the audience and mitigates the risk of policy violations.
Tip 6: Understand Appeal Procedures: Familiarize oneself with the appeal process for contesting account terminations. In the event of a suspension or deletion, compile comprehensive evidence to support the appeal, including licenses, permissions, or contextual explanations.
Consistently adhering to these guidelines significantly reduces the risk of YouTube account termination. Proactive compliance measures safeguard channel integrity, foster a positive audience experience, and mitigate potential disruptions to content creation and monetization efforts.
The subsequent section concludes this examination of YouTube account deletion, providing a concise summary of key findings and recommendations.
Conclusion
The preceding analysis has explored the multifaceted issue of “youtube deleted my account,” examining causes, consequences, and preventative measures. The inquiry revealed that terminations primarily stem from violations of platform policies regarding content, copyright, and security. Understanding the nuances of these policies, diligently adhering to them, and proactively safeguarding accounts are critical to mitigating the risk of such an outcome. The availability of an appeal process provides a potential avenue for recourse, but its success hinges on demonstrating compliance or challenging the basis for the termination.
The potential for the involuntary loss of a YouTube channel underscores the importance of responsible content creation and proactive account management. As the platform continues to evolve its policies and enforcement mechanisms, content creators must remain vigilant in upholding community standards and safeguarding their digital presence. The long-term sustainability of a YouTube channel is directly correlated with adherence to established guidelines and a commitment to maintaining a compliant and secure online environment. The absence of such commitment increases vulnerability to an event that can be both professionally and financially detrimental.
