Determining the precise date of a YouTube subscription is not a directly provided feature within the platform’s user interface. While YouTube offers a list of subscriptions, it does not display the specific date on which each subscription was initiated. Users seeking this information must employ alternative methods, often involving external tools or personal record-keeping. Understanding the limitations of YouTube’s native functionality is essential for managing expectations when attempting to ascertain subscription dates.
The ability to access subscription dates can be beneficial for various reasons. It allows users to track their evolving content consumption habits, identify long-standing content creators they have consistently followed, and potentially review the content they were initially drawn to from those creators. Furthermore, it can be useful for data analysis, particularly for researchers studying online engagement and user behavior within the YouTube ecosystem. Historically, the absence of this feature has led to the development of third-party browser extensions and websites aiming to fill this informational gap, though their reliability and security should always be carefully evaluated.
The subsequent sections will explore workarounds and potential methods for approximating or reconstructing subscription dates on YouTube, while acknowledging the inherent limitations and risks associated with non-official solutions. These methods may include examining email archives, leveraging third-party tools, and estimating based on the content available on the subscribed channel.
1. Email archives
Email archives represent a potentially valuable, albeit imperfect, resource for approximating the date a user subscribed to a YouTube channel. The effectiveness of this method hinges on whether the user’s email settings were configured to receive notifications of new channel subscriptions.
-
Subscription Confirmation Emails
Many users, upon subscribing to a YouTube channel, receive a confirmation email. These emails, often sent by YouTube or Google, serve as a record of the subscription initiation. The timestamp within such an email provides a relatively precise indication of the subscription date. However, reliance on these emails necessitates consistent email archiving practices and the absence of accidental deletion.
-
New Upload Notifications
YouTube typically sends email notifications when channels publish new content, provided the user has enabled such notifications. While not direct confirmation of the subscription date, the earliest of these notifications can serve as a reasonable proxy. By reviewing email archives and identifying the first notification received from a specific channel, one can estimate the subscription date, assuming notifications were enabled shortly after subscribing.
-
Email Search Functionality
Efficient searching within email archives is paramount. Utilizing specific keywords, such as the name of the YouTube channel or terms like “subscription” or “new video,” can expedite the process of locating relevant emails. Email providers typically offer advanced search features, allowing for narrowing results by sender, date range, and keywords, thereby increasing the accuracy of the estimation.
-
Limitations and Inaccuracies
The reliance on email archives is subject to several limitations. Users may have disabled email notifications, or the emails may have been automatically filtered or deleted. Furthermore, changes in notification settings over time can introduce inaccuracies. Consequently, while email archives offer a potential avenue for approximating subscription dates, they should not be considered a definitive or universally reliable source of information.
The reliance on email archives for determining subscription dates is contingent upon user practices and email settings. The method offers a plausible, though imperfect, solution to ascertain when one subscribed to a specific YouTube channel, given the inherent limitations within the YouTube platform itself.
2. Third-party tools
Third-party tools present a potential avenue for accessing YouTube subscription dates, though their utility is accompanied by inherent risks and limitations. These tools aim to augment the functionality of the YouTube platform by providing information not natively available, including historical subscription data. Their use necessitates a careful evaluation of security and reliability.
-
Browser Extensions
Browser extensions designed for YouTube often claim to enhance user experience by adding features such as subscription date tracking. These extensions typically operate by analyzing browsing history or interacting with YouTube’s API, if accessible, to infer subscription dates. However, users should exercise caution when installing such extensions, as they may pose security risks, including data harvesting and malware dissemination. Verifying the extension’s developer and reviewing user reviews are crucial steps to mitigate these risks.
-
Websites and Applications
Certain websites and applications assert the ability to retrieve YouTube subscription dates by requiring users to grant them access to their Google account data. While these platforms may offer a seemingly convenient solution, they present significant privacy concerns. Granting third-party access to Google accounts can expose sensitive information to potential misuse, including data breaches and unauthorized data sharing. The reputability and security protocols of such platforms should be rigorously examined before granting access.
-
Data Scraping Techniques
Some third-party tools employ data scraping techniques to extract information from YouTube profiles and channel pages. These methods involve automated extraction of publicly available data to infer subscription dates. However, data scraping is subject to ethical and legal considerations, as it may violate YouTube’s terms of service and infringe upon user privacy. Furthermore, the accuracy of data obtained through scraping is not guaranteed and may be unreliable.
-
API-Based Solutions
Tools leveraging the YouTube API theoretically could provide subscription date information. However, the YouTube API’s current functionality does not directly expose subscription dates for privacy reasons. Any tool claiming to use the API to circumvent this limitation should be viewed with skepticism. Changes in the API’s functionality can also render such tools ineffective, highlighting their reliance on potentially unstable methods.
The pursuit of subscription dates through third-party tools involves a trade-off between convenience and security. The absence of a native feature within YouTube encourages reliance on external solutions, yet users must exercise caution to safeguard their data and privacy. A thorough assessment of the tool’s reputation, security protocols, and data handling practices is essential before engaging with such services.
3. Channel upload history
Channel upload history serves as an indirect, yet potentially informative, element in attempting to ascertain a YouTube subscription date. While YouTube does not provide a direct indicator of subscription initiation, a user can leverage a channel’s content chronology to estimate the timeframe within which the subscription likely occurred. Analyzing the date of the earliest video that a user recalls viewing from a specific channel provides a starting point for this estimation. For instance, if a channel’s oldest available video dates back five years, and the user remembers watching content from that channel approximately three years ago, it can be reasonably inferred that the subscription occurred within the last three years. This approach is predicated on the assumption that the user began watching the channel shortly after subscribing.
Further refinement of the estimation can be achieved by cross-referencing the upload history with personal viewing habits or platform interactions. If the user recalls participating in discussions or liking videos from a channel around a specific event or time period, the upload dates surrounding that event can provide a more precise approximation. For example, if a channel uploaded a series of videos related to a trending topic that the user actively followed and engaged with, the subscription likely occurred prior to or during the release of that video series. Moreover, reviewing comments or social media posts from the relevant period can help validate these estimations. In cases where a channel experiences a significant shift in content style or topic, analyzing the upload history can also indicate when the user’s interests aligned with the channel’s output, providing an additional clue to the subscription timeframe.
The use of channel upload history to estimate subscription dates is not without limitations. The accuracy of the estimation depends heavily on the user’s memory and the completeness of the channel’s video archive. Videos may be removed, privacy settings altered, or the user’s recollection may be inaccurate. Consequently, this method serves as an approximation rather than a definitive solution. However, in the absence of a direct feature, channel upload history offers a valuable tool for contextualizing the timeframe within which a YouTube subscription likely occurred, contributing to a more informed understanding of user engagement and viewing patterns.
4. Subscription order
Subscription order, referring to the chronological sequence in which a user subscribed to various YouTube channels, offers a limited, yet potentially useful, method for approximating subscription dates. While YouTube does not explicitly display subscription dates, the order of subscriptions within a user’s subscription list can provide relative temporal information.
-
Relative Dating
The subscription list on YouTube typically displays channels in an order that reflects the sequence of subscriptions, although this order is not always perfectly chronological due to algorithm adjustments or user modifications. By comparing the position of a specific channel within the list relative to other channels with known subscription dates, a user can infer a rough timeframe for the unknown subscription. For example, if a channel appears between two channels with known subscription dates, the subscription to the channel in question likely occurred between those two dates.
-
Initial Subscription Burst
Many users experience an initial surge of subscriptions upon joining YouTube, often subscribing to numerous channels within a short period. In these instances, determining the precise subscription order becomes challenging, as the timestamps may be closely clustered. However, even within this initial burst, the relative order can still provide some insight. Identifying landmark channels, such as those subscribed to on a specific date or event, and comparing the position of the target channel relative to these landmarks can offer a more refined estimation.
-
Manual Reordering and Algorithm Influence
It is important to acknowledge that YouTube’s algorithms can influence the display order of subscriptions, and users may manually reorder their subscription lists. These factors can introduce inaccuracies when attempting to infer subscription dates based solely on the list order. Algorithms may prioritize channels with higher engagement rates or those recommended to the user, altering the chronological sequence. Similarly, users may reorder channels for organizational purposes, disrupting the original subscription order.
-
Limitations and Inconsistencies
Relying solely on subscription order to determine subscription dates is inherently limited. The lack of precise timestamps, coupled with algorithmic influences and user modifications, renders this method an approximation rather than a definitive solution. Furthermore, changes in YouTube’s interface or data storage practices can potentially alter the historical subscription order, further complicating the process. This method provides a general indication but should not be considered a precise source of information.
In conclusion, while subscription order can offer clues regarding the timeframe of a YouTube subscription, its utility is constrained by factors such as algorithmic influence, manual reordering, and the absence of precise timestamps. It serves as one piece of evidence among several potential sources, contributing to an overall estimation rather than providing a definitive answer. Users seeking to determine subscription dates should consider a combination of methods, including email archives, channel upload history, and, if available, any personal records.
5. Browser extensions
Browser extensions function as intermediaries between the user and the YouTube platform, offering a potential, though often unreliable, means of ascertaining subscription dates. These extensions, installed directly into the user’s web browser, aim to augment YouTube’s native functionality by providing features not natively present, including the ability to track or estimate when a user subscribed to a particular channel. The connection between browser extensions and the objective of determining subscription dates arises from the limitations inherent in YouTube’s interface; the platform does not directly display the date a user subscribed to a channel, creating a demand for external solutions. The effectiveness of browser extensions in this context varies considerably based on their methodology, data sources, and the degree to which they comply with YouTube’s terms of service and data privacy standards. Some extensions may analyze browsing history, attempting to infer subscription dates based on the user’s initial interactions with a channel’s content. Others might claim to leverage YouTube’s API, though this approach is often limited by API restrictions and the platform’s privacy safeguards. In practice, the utility of these extensions is often tempered by concerns related to accuracy, security, and potential conflicts with YouTube’s policies.
The practical application of browser extensions for identifying subscription dates is multifaceted but carries risks. For example, a user might install a browser extension that promises to display subscription dates directly on the YouTube interface. Upon activation, the extension analyzes the user’s subscription list and attempts to estimate subscription dates based on various data points. While this approach may provide a semblance of a solution, the accuracy of the estimated dates is not guaranteed. Furthermore, the extension’s access to the user’s browsing history and YouTube account data raises valid privacy concerns. The extension could potentially collect and transmit user data without explicit consent, compromising the user’s online security. Moreover, browser extensions are often subject to updates or changes in YouTube’s platform, which can render them ineffective or even harmful. A previously functional extension may become obsolete or start exhibiting malicious behavior following a YouTube update. Real-world examples abound of browser extensions that initially offer useful features but subsequently become sources of malware or data breaches. Consequently, users should exercise extreme caution when considering the use of browser extensions for accessing YouTube subscription dates or any other non-native functionality.
In summary, the connection between browser extensions and the objective of ascertaining YouTube subscription dates is characterized by a trade-off between potential convenience and inherent risks. While these extensions may offer a workaround for the absence of a native feature within YouTube, their reliability and security are far from guaranteed. The challenges associated with browser extensions include accuracy limitations, privacy concerns, and the potential for malicious behavior. Given these factors, it is crucial to approach the use of browser extensions with a critical mindset, prioritizing data security and privacy over the perceived benefits of accessing subscription dates. The broader theme underscores the importance of relying on official platform features whenever possible and exercising caution when engaging with third-party tools that claim to enhance functionality, particularly those that require access to sensitive user data.
6. Account activity
Account activity, encompassing a log of user actions and events within the YouTube platform, offers a limited but potentially relevant resource when attempting to determine subscription dates. The connection lies in the theoretical possibility of tracing initial interactions with a channel through the account activity record, providing an approximate timeframe for the subscription. The significance of account activity as a component of this endeavor stems from its function as a historical record of platform usage. Real-life examples include instances where users might recall liking a specific video from a channel around a certain date. Correlating this memory with the account activity log, which records video likes, could provide a rough estimate of when the user began engaging with the channel, thereby suggesting a potential subscription date. The practical significance of this understanding resides in its ability to contextualize user behavior and approximate subscription timelines when direct information is unavailable.
Further analysis reveals that the utility of account activity is constrained by several factors. YouTube’s account activity logs typically do not provide detailed information regarding subscription initiation. Instead, they primarily focus on broader engagement metrics such as video views, likes, comments, and search queries. While examining these interactions may offer indirect clues, they rarely yield definitive subscription dates. For example, if a user consistently watched videos from a specific channel for an extended period before ever liking or commenting, the account activity log might only reflect the latter actions, providing an incomplete picture of the user’s initial engagement. Moreover, the granularity of the data and the retention period of account activity logs can vary, limiting the availability of historical information. These limitations highlight the challenges inherent in relying solely on account activity to determine subscription dates and underscore the need for alternative or complementary methods.
In conclusion, while account activity offers a theoretical connection to the objective of ascertaining YouTube subscription dates, its practical application is restricted by data limitations and the absence of direct subscription records. The method provides a supplementary source of information, capable of offering indirect clues and contextualizing user behavior, but it should not be considered a definitive solution. The challenges associated with account activity emphasize the broader theme of the difficulties in accessing historical subscription data on YouTube and the need for a multifaceted approach that incorporates various sources and estimation techniques.
7. Personal records
Personal records, maintained independently by users, represent a potentially accurate, though often underutilized, method for determining YouTube subscription dates. The explicit connection between personal records and ascertaining subscription dates arises from the proactive recording of subscription activities at the time they occur. Such records can take various forms, from simple spreadsheets and text files to dedicated note-taking applications, and their value lies in their direct documentation of subscription events. For instance, a user may habitually log each new YouTube subscription in a personal spreadsheet, noting the channel name and the date of subscription. These records, if consistently maintained, provide definitive evidence of subscription dates, circumventing the limitations of YouTube’s native features. The practical significance of personal records is substantial, offering a reliable alternative to indirect estimation methods or unreliable third-party tools.
Further analysis reveals that the effectiveness of personal records is contingent on the user’s diligence and consistency in maintaining them. Unlike relying on potentially incomplete email archives or third-party tools, personal records provide a direct and verifiable source of information, assuming they are accurately and consistently updated. However, the absence of consistent record-keeping practices renders this method ineffective. Real-world examples illustrate both the potential and the limitations. A researcher studying online content consumption may meticulously track their YouTube subscriptions, providing a valuable dataset for analysis. Conversely, a casual user who sporadically notes subscriptions in a haphazard manner may find their records incomplete or unreliable. The practical application hinges on the user’s commitment to maintaining accurate and comprehensive records over time.
In conclusion, personal records offer a potentially accurate and reliable method for determining YouTube subscription dates, contingent upon the user’s commitment to consistent and diligent record-keeping. This method provides a direct source of information, circumventing the limitations of YouTube’s native features and the inherent risks associated with third-party tools. The challenges lie in the user’s ability to maintain accurate and comprehensive records over time, underscoring the broader theme that proactive data management practices are essential for accessing historical information not readily provided by online platforms.
8. Privacy settings
The relationship between privacy settings and the ability to ascertain subscription dates on YouTube is characterized by a complex interplay of information availability and user control. YouTube’s privacy settings directly influence the visibility of user activity, including subscriptions, thereby affecting the feasibility of determining when a user subscribed to a particular channel. A user’s choice to make their subscriptions public or private dictates whether this information is accessible to others, including the channel owner and other users. If a user’s subscriptions are set to private, external attempts to definitively determine subscription dates are significantly hampered, if not rendered impossible, through conventional methods. The importance of privacy settings in this context cannot be overstated, as they serve as a primary mechanism for users to control their digital footprint and limit the dissemination of their online activities. For example, a channel owner attempting to track their subscriber growth might find their efforts frustrated by users who have opted to keep their subscriptions private, resulting in an incomplete understanding of their subscriber base.
Further examination reveals that privacy settings also impact the efficacy of indirect methods for estimating subscription dates. Even when subscriptions are private, certain clues might still be gleaned from publicly available engagement data, such as comments or video likes. However, the absence of direct subscription information complicates the process and reduces the accuracy of any derived estimates. Furthermore, privacy settings extend beyond the mere visibility of subscriptions; they also govern the accessibility of other user activity data, such as viewing history and saved playlists. The restriction of this additional data further limits the potential for inferring subscription dates through alternative means. The practical application of this understanding is evident in the design of third-party tools that attempt to estimate subscription dates. Such tools often rely on publicly available information, and their effectiveness is directly proportional to the extent to which users have chosen to make their activity data visible. Consequently, the prevalence of private subscriptions creates a significant challenge for these tools, reducing their reliability and utility.
In conclusion, privacy settings exert a considerable influence on the feasibility of determining YouTube subscription dates. The ability to control the visibility of subscription information empowers users to manage their online privacy, but it also introduces challenges for those seeking to track or estimate subscription timelines. The limitations imposed by privacy settings underscore the broader theme of balancing data accessibility with user autonomy, highlighting the importance of respecting individual privacy preferences while acknowledging the impact on data analysis and information retrieval efforts.
9. API limitations
The YouTube Data API, while a powerful tool for accessing channel and video information, imposes limitations that directly affect the ability to determine when a user subscribed to a specific channel. The absence of a direct endpoint to retrieve subscription dates significantly restricts programmatic access to this information. This limitation stems from privacy considerations and the platform’s design, which prioritizes user data protection over unfettered access to granular subscription details. Consequently, developers seeking to provide subscription date information through third-party applications are confronted with significant technical hurdles.
-
Absence of Subscription Date Endpoint
The YouTube Data API does not offer a dedicated endpoint that explicitly returns the date on which a user subscribed to a channel. This absence forces developers to rely on indirect methods, such as analyzing comment histories or video engagement patterns, to infer subscription dates. However, these methods are inherently imprecise and subject to inaccuracies, as they do not provide a definitive record of the subscription event. The lack of a direct endpoint fundamentally limits the feasibility of creating accurate and reliable tools for tracking subscription timelines.
-
Rate Limiting and Quotas
The YouTube Data API enforces rate limits and daily quotas on API requests, restricting the number of calls that can be made within a given timeframe. This limitation poses a challenge for applications that require processing large volumes of subscription data. Even if an indirect method for estimating subscription dates were devised, the rate limits could prevent the analysis of sufficient historical data to achieve meaningful accuracy. The practical implication is that applications are often unable to process subscription data for a large user base or analyze extensive channel histories due to API restrictions.
-
Data Privacy and User Authorization
The YouTube Data API requires user authorization to access private data, such as a user’s subscriptions list. However, even with proper authorization, the API does not expose subscription dates, reflecting YouTube’s commitment to user privacy. Furthermore, the API’s terms of service prohibit the collection and storage of user data without explicit consent, further restricting the ability to track subscription patterns over time. These privacy safeguards, while essential for protecting user information, significantly limit the data available for determining subscription dates.
-
API Versioning and Deprecation
The YouTube Data API undergoes periodic version updates and deprecations, which can impact the functionality of applications relying on specific API endpoints or data structures. If an application were to rely on a workaround for estimating subscription dates using a particular API feature, a future API update could render that method obsolete. This instability introduces a degree of risk for developers attempting to provide subscription date information, as their solutions may require ongoing maintenance and adaptation to accommodate API changes.
In summary, the limitations imposed by the YouTube Data API, particularly the absence of a subscription date endpoint, rate limiting, privacy restrictions, and API versioning, significantly constrain the ability to determine when a user subscribed to a channel. These restrictions necessitate reliance on indirect and often unreliable methods, highlighting the challenges associated with accessing granular subscription data on the YouTube platform. The API’s design choices reflect a prioritization of user privacy and platform stability over unrestricted data access, shaping the landscape for developers seeking to provide subscription-related functionality.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following section addresses common inquiries regarding the ability to ascertain the date on which a YouTube subscription was initiated. The information provided clarifies the limitations of native YouTube features and explores potential alternative approaches.
Question 1: Is it possible to directly view the date one subscribed to a YouTube channel within the YouTube interface?
No, YouTube does not natively provide a feature that displays the exact date of subscription for each channel in a user’s subscription list. The platform prioritizes data privacy and streamlined user experience over providing granular subscription details.
Question 2: Are there official YouTube tools or methods to access historical subscription data?
Currently, YouTube does not offer official tools or methods for users to directly access historical subscription data, including the precise dates of subscription initiation. Any attempt to access such data necessitates exploring alternative, non-official approaches.
Question 3: Can third-party browser extensions or websites reliably provide YouTube subscription dates?
While some third-party browser extensions and websites claim to offer this functionality, their reliability and security are not guaranteed. These tools may rely on indirect methods or data scraping techniques, which are prone to inaccuracies. Furthermore, the use of such tools carries inherent privacy risks, as they may require access to user account data.
Question 4: Is it possible to estimate a subscription date by examining email archives?
Reviewing email archives for subscription confirmation emails or new upload notifications from a channel can potentially provide an approximate subscription date. However, this method relies on the user’s email settings and archiving practices, and the absence of relevant emails does not necessarily indicate that a subscription did not occur.
Question 5: How can one utilize a channel’s upload history to estimate a subscription date?
By examining a channel’s upload history and identifying the earliest video that a user recalls viewing, it is possible to estimate a timeframe within which the subscription likely occurred. This method is based on the assumption that the user began watching the channel shortly after subscribing.
Question 6: Do YouTube’s privacy settings impact the ability to determine subscription dates?
Yes, YouTube’s privacy settings, particularly the option to make subscriptions private, directly impact the visibility of subscription information. When subscriptions are set to private, external attempts to ascertain subscription dates are significantly limited.
In summary, the determination of YouTube subscription dates is challenging due to the limitations of native platform features and the absence of direct access to historical subscription data. Alternative methods, such as examining email archives or analyzing channel upload history, may provide approximate estimations, but their reliability is not guaranteed.
The subsequent section will delve into advanced strategies for approximating subscription dates, including the use of specialized search techniques and data analysis methods.
Navigating the Labyrinth
While YouTube does not provide a direct method for ascertaining subscription dates, certain strategies can be employed to approximate the timeframe. These methods require diligent effort and an understanding of the platform’s data limitations.
Tip 1: Conduct a Meticulous Examination of Email Archives. Utilize advanced search operators within email clients to isolate subscription confirmation emails or early notification emails from the target channel. This process necessitates a comprehensive understanding of email filtering rules and archiving settings.
Tip 2: Analyze Channel Upload History in Conjunction with Personal Recall. Cross-reference the channel’s video archive with personal viewing habits and memories. Identify the earliest video the user remembers watching, and consider significant events or discussions related to the channel around that time. This method requires a degree of self-reflection and potentially the consultation of external sources, such as personal diaries or social media posts.
Tip 3: Leverage Browser History as a Supplementary Data Source. While not definitive, browser history may contain records of initial channel visits or video views. Filtering browser history by the channel’s URL can reveal potential dates of first engagement, providing additional context for estimating the subscription date. This method is contingent on the user’s browsing habits and the completeness of their browser history.
Tip 4: Consider the Relative Order of Subscriptions Within the Subscription List. While the order is not always perfectly chronological, comparing the position of the target channel with other channels with known subscription dates can provide a rough timeframe. This method requires a methodical review of the subscription list and the identification of reference channels with established subscription dates.
Tip 5: Employ Specialized Search Techniques Within YouTube. Utilize specific search queries to identify comments or likes made on the channel’s early videos. These interactions can provide a timestamp indicating engagement with the channel, potentially predating the subscription date. This method necessitates advanced search skills and an understanding of YouTube’s comment filtering and display mechanisms.
Tip 6: Investigate Archived Web Pages. Using services like the Wayback Machine, one might potentially discover past versions of their YouTube subscription list. This is highly speculative and relies on the Wayback Machine having captured the specific user’s subscription page at a relevant point in time.
These strategies, while not guaranteeing definitive subscription dates, offer avenues for approximating the timeframe. The most effective approach involves a combination of these methods, leveraging multiple data sources to triangulate the likely subscription period.
The subsequent section will provide a comprehensive conclusion, summarizing the key challenges and limitations associated with determining YouTube subscription dates.
Conclusion
The exploration of methods for determining how to see when you subscribed to someone on YouTube reveals a landscape characterized by limitations and indirect approaches. While the platform lacks a direct feature for accessing historical subscription dates, alternative strategies, such as examining email archives, analyzing channel upload history, and leveraging browser history, offer potential avenues for approximation. The efficacy of these methods varies considerably, contingent on user practices, data availability, and the inherent constraints of the YouTube Data API. Privacy settings further complicate the process, restricting access to subscription information and emphasizing the platform’s commitment to user data protection.
The absence of a definitive solution underscores the importance of proactive data management practices and the need for a discerning approach when engaging with third-party tools promising access to subscription data. As YouTube continues to evolve its platform and prioritize user privacy, the challenge of accurately determining subscription dates remains. Further research and development may yield more sophisticated methods, but the current landscape necessitates a cautious and informed approach to accessing this elusive information. Users are encouraged to advocate for greater transparency and data accessibility while respecting the platform’s privacy safeguards.
